You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Dietary fiber intake from fresh and preserved food and risk of nasopharyngeal carcinoma: observational evidence from a Chinese population
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nutrition Journal, February 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12937-021-00667-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Zhi-Ming MAI, Roger Kai-Cheong NGAN, Dora Lai-Wan KWONG, Wai-Tong NG, Kam-Tong Yuen, Dennis Kai-Ming Ip, Yap-Hang CHAN, Anne Wing-Mui LEE, Sai-Yin HO, Maria Li LUNG, Tai-Hing LAM |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 22% |
| Dominican Republic | 1 | 11% |
| France | 1 | 11% |
| Algeria | 1 | 11% |
| Spain | 1 | 11% |
| Belgium | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 2 | 22% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 67% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 29 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 3 | 10% |
| Other | 2 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 3% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 3% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 2 | 7% |
| Unknown | 19 | 66% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 17% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 7% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 3% |
| Engineering | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 20 | 69% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 February 2021.
All research outputs
#6,195,952
of 24,212,485 outputs
Outputs from Nutrition Journal
#835
of 1,465 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#147,876
of 513,342 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nutrition Journal
#14
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,212,485 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,465 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.3. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 513,342 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.