You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Cost per DALY averted in low, middle- and high-income countries: evidence from the global burden of disease study to estimate the cost-effectiveness thresholds
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation, February 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12962-021-00260-0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Rajabali Daroudi, Ali Akbari Sari, Azin Nahvijou, Ahmad Faramarzi |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 105 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 105 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 13 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 11 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 11 | 10% |
| Unknown | 44 | 42% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 16 | 15% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 8 | 8% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 6% |
| Engineering | 6 | 6% |
| Other | 16 | 15% |
| Unknown | 46 | 44% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 March 2023.
All research outputs
#2,914,479
of 24,727,020 outputs
Outputs from Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation
#59
of 492 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#78,846
of 518,049 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation
#5
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,727,020 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 492 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 518,049 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.