↓ Skip to main content

Cost per DALY averted in low, middle- and high-income countries: evidence from the global burden of disease study to estimate the cost-effectiveness thresholds

Overview of attention for article published in Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation, February 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
3 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
75 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Cost per DALY averted in low, middle- and high-income countries: evidence from the global burden of disease study to estimate the cost-effectiveness thresholds
Published in
Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation, February 2021
DOI 10.1186/s12962-021-00260-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rajabali Daroudi, Ali Akbari Sari, Azin Nahvijou, Ahmad Faramarzi

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 75 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 75 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 10 13%
Student > Master 10 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 9%
Student > Bachelor 7 9%
Unspecified 6 8%
Other 9 12%
Unknown 26 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 10 13%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 8 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 8%
Unspecified 6 8%
Engineering 5 7%
Other 13 17%
Unknown 27 36%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 March 2021.
All research outputs
#3,213,467
of 20,494,250 outputs
Outputs from Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation
#75
of 393 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#83,580
of 407,316 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 20,494,250 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 393 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 407,316 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them