You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
| Title |
Developing a guideline for clinical trial protocol content: Delphi consensus survey
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Trials, September 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1745-6215-13-176 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jennifer Marie Tetzlaff, David Moher, An-Wen Chan |
| Abstract |
Recent evidence has highlighted deficiencies in clinical trial protocols, having implications for many groups. Existing guidelines for randomized clinical trial (RCT) protocol content vary substantially and most do not describe systematic methodology for their development. As one of three prespecified steps for the systematic development of a guideline for trial protocol content, the objective of this study was to conduct a three-round Delphi consensus survey to develop and refine minimum content for RCT protocols. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 134 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 1% |
| Colombia | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Belgium | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 127 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 24 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 22 | 16% |
| Researcher | 19 | 14% |
| Other | 14 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 7% |
| Other | 31 | 23% |
| Unknown | 14 | 10% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 48 | 36% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 12 | 9% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 6% |
| Psychology | 8 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 7 | 5% |
| Other | 31 | 23% |
| Unknown | 20 | 15% |