You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Determinants of the daily rhythm of blood fluidity
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Circadian Rhythms, June 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1740-3391-7-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Tatsushi Kimura, Tsutomu Inamizu, Kiyokazu Sekikawa, Masayuki Kakehashi, Kiyoshi Onari |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 9% |
| Unknown | 10 | 91% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 36% |
| Researcher | 4 | 36% |
| Professor | 1 | 9% |
| Other | 1 | 9% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 9% |
| Other | 1 | 9% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 45% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 27% |
| Energy | 1 | 9% |
| Sports and Recreations | 1 | 9% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 9% |
| Other | 1 | 9% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 August 2023.
All research outputs
#7,645,091
of 23,277,141 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Circadian Rhythms
#43
of 103 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,969
of 111,965 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Circadian Rhythms
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,277,141 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 103 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 111,965 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them