You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Techniques for extraction and isolation of natural products: a comprehensive review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Chinese Medicine, April 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13020-018-0177-x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Qing-Wen Zhang, Li-Gen Lin, Wen-Cai Ye |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6,207 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 6207 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 1084 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 504 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 325 | 5% |
| Researcher | 224 | 4% |
| Lecturer | 181 | 3% |
| Other | 597 | 10% |
| Unknown | 3292 | 53% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chemistry | 518 | 8% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 509 | 8% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 411 | 7% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 349 | 6% |
| Chemical Engineering | 246 | 4% |
| Other | 762 | 12% |
| Unknown | 3412 | 55% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 January 2024.
All research outputs
#3,123,039
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Chinese Medicine
#49
of 660 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#61,697
of 340,618 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Chinese Medicine
#2
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 660 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 340,618 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 8 of them.