↓ Skip to main content

Noise correlation in PET, CT, SPECT and PET/CT data evaluated using autocorrelation function: a phantom study on data, reconstructed using FBP and OSEM

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Imaging, August 2005
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
60 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
89 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Noise correlation in PET, CT, SPECT and PET/CT data evaluated using autocorrelation function: a phantom study on data, reconstructed using FBP and OSEM
Published in
BMC Medical Imaging, August 2005
DOI 10.1186/1471-2342-5-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Pasha Razifar, Mattias Sandström, Harald Schnieder, Bengt Långström, Enn Maripuu, Ewert Bengtsson, Mats Bergström

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 89 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 1 1%
Italy 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Belgium 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Unknown 84 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 19%
Researcher 13 15%
Other 11 12%
Student > Master 11 12%
Student > Bachelor 9 10%
Other 15 17%
Unknown 13 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 22 25%
Engineering 20 22%
Physics and Astronomy 16 18%
Computer Science 6 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 3%
Other 7 8%
Unknown 15 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 April 2020.
All research outputs
#7,645,563
of 23,278,709 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Imaging
#107
of 614 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,657
of 58,747 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Imaging
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,278,709 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 614 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 58,747 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them