↓ Skip to main content

Low sensitivity of a urine LAM-ELISA in the diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Infectious Diseases, August 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets

Citations

dimensions_citation
68 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
112 Mendeley
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Low sensitivity of a urine LAM-ELISA in the diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis
Published in
BMC Infectious Diseases, August 2009
DOI 10.1186/1471-2334-9-141
Pubmed ID
Authors

Klaus Reither, Elmar Saathoff, Jutta Jung, Lilian T Minja, Inge Kroidl, Eiman Saad, Jim F Huggett, Elias N Ntinginya, Lucas Maganga, Leonard Maboko, Michael Hoelscher

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 112 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
South Africa 3 3%
Colombia 1 <1%
Malawi 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 104 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 32 29%
Student > Master 16 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 12%
Student > Postgraduate 9 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 8%
Other 25 22%
Unknown 8 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 55 49%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 13%
Immunology and Microbiology 8 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 7%
Engineering 6 5%
Other 9 8%
Unknown 12 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 June 2021.
All research outputs
#2,054,902
of 23,278,709 outputs
Outputs from BMC Infectious Diseases
#579
of 7,791 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,520
of 91,688 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Infectious Diseases
#3
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,278,709 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,791 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 91,688 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.