↓ Skip to main content

Correction to: Culturable bacteria associated with Anopheles darlingi and their paratransgenesis potential

Overview of attention for article published in Malaria Journal, February 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 tweeters
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Correction to: Culturable bacteria associated with Anopheles darlingi and their paratransgenesis potential
Published in
Malaria Journal, February 2021
DOI 10.1186/s12936-021-03609-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Elerson Matos Rocha, Osvaldo Marinotti, Deidre Machado Serrão, Laura Viana Correa, Ricardo de Melo Katak, Juan Campos de Oliveira, Veranilce Alves Muniz, Marta Rodrigues de Oliveira, Joaquim Ferreira do Nascimento Neto, Marcos Cézar Fernandes Pessoa, Rosemary Aparecida Roque, Adolfo Jose da Mota, Piero Onorati, Jayme A. Souza-Neto, Olle Terenius, Wanderli Pedro Tadei

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 February 2021.
All research outputs
#11,255,468
of 17,389,828 outputs
Outputs from Malaria Journal
#3,758
of 4,797 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#192,404
of 320,625 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Malaria Journal
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,389,828 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,797 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 320,625 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.