You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Correction to: Culturable bacteria associated with Anopheles darlingi and their paratransgenesis potential
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Malaria Journal, February 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12936-021-03609-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Elerson Matos Rocha, Osvaldo Marinotti, Deidre Machado Serrão, Laura Viana Correa, Ricardo de Melo Katak, Juan Campos de Oliveira, Veranilce Alves Muniz, Marta Rodrigues de Oliveira, Joaquim Ferreira do Nascimento Neto, Marcos Cézar Fernandes Pessoa, Rosemary Aparecida Roque, Adolfo Jose da Mota, Piero Onorati, Jayme A. Souza-Neto, Olle Terenius, Wanderli Pedro Tadei |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 3 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 February 2021.
All research outputs
#15,666,906
of 23,278,709 outputs
Outputs from Malaria Journal
#4,549
of 5,645 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#311,757
of 513,567 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Malaria Journal
#139
of 165 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,278,709 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,645 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 513,567 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 165 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.