↓ Skip to main content

The effect of alcohol advertising, marketing and portrayal on drinking behaviour in young people: systematic review of prospective cohort studies

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, February 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#48 of 16,119)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
55 news outlets
blogs
6 blogs
policy
5 policy sources
twitter
9 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
380 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
477 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The effect of alcohol advertising, marketing and portrayal on drinking behaviour in young people: systematic review of prospective cohort studies
Published in
BMC Public Health, February 2009
DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-9-51
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lesley A Smith, David R Foxcroft

Abstract

The effect of alcohol portrayals and advertising on the drinking behaviour of young people is a matter of much debate. We evaluated the relationship between exposure to alcohol advertising, marketing and portrayal on subsequent drinking behaviour in young people by systematic review of cohort (longitudinal) studies.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 477 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 7 1%
United Kingdom 4 <1%
Chile 2 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Kenya 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Turkey 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
Other 2 <1%
Unknown 456 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 98 21%
Student > Bachelor 65 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 60 13%
Researcher 58 12%
Student > Postgraduate 31 6%
Other 78 16%
Unknown 87 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 92 19%
Social Sciences 74 16%
Business, Management and Accounting 51 11%
Psychology 43 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 31 6%
Other 82 17%
Unknown 104 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 502. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 February 2023.
All research outputs
#47,841
of 24,397,600 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#48
of 16,119 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#93
of 179,062 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#2
of 43 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,397,600 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,119 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 179,062 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 43 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.