↓ Skip to main content

Exploring the evolutionary dynamics of plasmids: the Acinetobacter pan-plasmidome

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Ecology and Evolution, February 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users
patent
2 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
76 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
157 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Exploring the evolutionary dynamics of plasmids: the Acinetobacter pan-plasmidome
Published in
BMC Ecology and Evolution, February 2010
DOI 10.1186/1471-2148-10-59
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marco Fondi, Giovanni Bacci, Matteo Brilli, Maria Cristiana Papaleo, Alessio Mengoni, Mario Vaneechoutte, Lenie Dijkshoorn, Renato Fani

Abstract

Prokaryotic plasmids have a dual importance in the microbial world: first they have a great impact on the metabolic functions of the host cell, providing additional traits that can be accumulated in the cell without altering the gene content of the bacterial chromosome. Additionally and/or alternatively, from a genome perspective, plasmids can provide a basis for genomic rearrangements via homologous recombination and so they can facilitate the loss or acquisition of genes during these events, which eventually may lead to horizontal gene transfer (HGT). Given their importance for conferring adaptive traits to the host organisms, the interest in plasmid sequencing is growing and now many complete plasmid sequences are available online.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 157 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 1%
Spain 2 1%
United Kingdom 2 1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Argentina 1 <1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 144 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 39 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 38 24%
Student > Master 17 11%
Student > Bachelor 14 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 10 6%
Other 25 16%
Unknown 14 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 76 48%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 30 19%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 4%
Environmental Science 6 4%
Immunology and Microbiology 6 4%
Other 8 5%
Unknown 24 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 July 2020.
All research outputs
#4,262,161
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from BMC Ecology and Evolution
#1,094
of 3,714 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,106
of 102,764 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Ecology and Evolution
#14
of 45 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,714 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 102,764 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 45 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.