You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A mega-aggregation framework synthesis of the barriers and facilitators to linkage, adherence to ART and retention in care among people living with HIV
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Systematic Reviews, February 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13643-021-01582-z |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Lynn Hendricks, Ingrid Eshun-Wilson, Anke Rohwer |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 33% |
| South Africa | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 3 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 3 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 3 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 117 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 117 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 14 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 6 | 5% |
| Other | 12 | 10% |
| Unknown | 53 | 45% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 19 | 16% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 16 | 14% |
| Social Sciences | 9 | 8% |
| Psychology | 8 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 10 | 9% |
| Unknown | 52 | 44% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 October 2023.
All research outputs
#2,143,626
of 24,589,002 outputs
Outputs from Systematic Reviews
#352
of 2,144 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#60,991
of 524,453 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Systematic Reviews
#10
of 69 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,589,002 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,144 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 524,453 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 69 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.