↓ Skip to main content

Neurogenetic interactions and aberrant behavioral co-morbidity of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD): dispelling myths

Overview of attention for article published in Theoretical Biology and Medical Modelling, December 2005
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
27 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
90 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Neurogenetic interactions and aberrant behavioral co-morbidity of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD): dispelling myths
Published in
Theoretical Biology and Medical Modelling, December 2005
DOI 10.1186/1742-4682-2-50
Pubmed ID
Authors

David E Comings, Thomas JH Chen, Kenneth Blum, Julie F Mengucci, Seth H Blum, Brian Meshkin

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 90 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 3 3%
United States 1 1%
Unknown 86 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 18%
Researcher 15 17%
Student > Master 12 13%
Student > Bachelor 9 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 9%
Other 18 20%
Unknown 12 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 22 24%
Psychology 17 19%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 6%
Social Sciences 4 4%
Other 14 16%
Unknown 17 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 October 2020.
All research outputs
#7,646,569
of 23,281,392 outputs
Outputs from Theoretical Biology and Medical Modelling
#99
of 288 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,544
of 155,664 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Theoretical Biology and Medical Modelling
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,281,392 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 288 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 155,664 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.