↓ Skip to main content

Liposome bupivacaine for pain control after total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, July 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
40 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Liposome bupivacaine for pain control after total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis
Published in
Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, July 2016
DOI 10.1186/s13018-016-0420-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Zhong Qing Wu, Ji Kang Min, Dan Wang, Yong Jian Yuan, Heng Li

Abstract

Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is associated with intense and long-duration pain. Research is currently being conducted on the use of liposome bupivacaine (LB) to prolong the effects of local infiltration anesthesia. This systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluated the efficacy and safety of pain control of using LB versus placebo after TKA. In April 2016, the Medline, Embase, PubMed, Cochrane Controlled Trials Register (CENTRAL), Web of Science, Google database, and Chinese Wanfang databases were searched to identify articles that compare a LB group versus a control group for pain control after TKA. This systematic review and meta-analysis were performed according to the PRISMA statement criteria. The primary endpoint was the visual analogue scale (VAS) score after TKA at 24, 48, and 72 h. The second outcome was nausea complications, which represent morphine-related side effects. Stata 12.0 software was used for the meta-analysis. Five studies involving 574 patients met the inclusion criteria. The meta-analysis revealed that LB can decrease the VAS score at 24 h (mean difference (MD) = -0.50; 95 % CI -0.97 to -0.04; P = 0.034), 48 h (MD = -0.26; 95 % CI -0.71 to 0.19; P = 0.256), and 72 h (MD = -0.26; 95 % CI -0.71 to 0.19; P = 0.256). There was no significant difference with respect to the length of hospital stay (MD = -0.08; 95 % CI -0.28 to 0.13; P = 0.475). Furthermore, LB can reduce the occurrence of nausea (RR = 0.38; 95 % CI 0.18 to 0.79; P = 0.009). Based on the current meta-analysis, LB as a novel anesthetic formulation administration following TKA demonstrated better pain control; however, the sample size was limited, and further RCTs are needed to identify the effects of LB after TKA.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 40 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 6 15%
Student > Master 6 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 8%
Researcher 3 8%
Student > Bachelor 2 5%
Other 6 15%
Unknown 14 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 17 43%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 3%
Unspecified 1 3%
Social Sciences 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 15 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 May 2017.
All research outputs
#17,811,358
of 22,881,154 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
#901
of 1,378 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#265,733
of 364,027 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
#24
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,881,154 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,378 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 364,027 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.