↓ Skip to main content

Development and validation of a self-administered questionnaire to estimate the distance and mode of children’s travel to school in urban India

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Research Methodology, October 2015
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
92 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Development and validation of a self-administered questionnaire to estimate the distance and mode of children’s travel to school in urban India
Published in
BMC Medical Research Methodology, October 2015
DOI 10.1186/s12874-015-0086-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Shailaja Tetali, Phil Edwards, G. V. S. Murthy, I. Roberts

Abstract

Although some 300 million Indian children travel to school every day, little is known about how they get there. This information is important for transport planners and public health authorities. This paper presents the development of a self-administered questionnaire and examines its reliability and validity in estimating distance and mode of travel to school in a low resource urban setting. We developed a questionnaire on children's travel to school. We assessed test re-test reliability by repeating the questionnaire one week later (n = 61). The questionnaire was improved and re-tested (n = 68). We examined the convergent validity of distance estimates by comparing estimates based on the nearest landmark to children's homes with a 'gold standard' based on one-to-one interviews with children using detailed maps (n = 50). Most questions showed fair to almost perfect agreement. Questions on usual mode of travel (κ 0.73- 0.84) and road injury (κ 0.61- 0.72) were found to be more reliable than those on parental permissions (κ 0.18- 0.30), perception of safety (κ 0.00- 0.54), and physical activity (κ -0.01- 0.07). The distance estimated by the nearest landmark method was not significantly different than the in-depth method for walking , 52 m [95 % CI -32 m to 135 m], 10 % of the mean difference, and for walking and cycling combined, 65 m [95 % CI -30 m to 159 m], 11 % of the mean difference. For children who used motorized transport (excluding private school bus), the nearest landmark method under-estimated distance by an average of 325 metres [95 % CI -664 m to 1314 m], 15 % of the mean difference. A self-administered questionnaire was found to provide reliable information on the usual mode of travel to school, and road injury, in a small sample of children in Hyderabad, India. The 'nearest landmark' method can be applied in similar low-resource settings, for a reasonably accurate estimate of the distance from a child's home to school.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 92 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Malaysia 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
Unknown 90 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 16 17%
Researcher 15 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 16%
Professor 6 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 5%
Other 20 22%
Unknown 15 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 16 17%
Engineering 15 16%
Social Sciences 10 11%
Sports and Recreations 6 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 4%
Other 21 23%
Unknown 20 22%