↓ Skip to main content

Effectiveness and process evaluation in obesity and type 2 diabetes prevention programs in children: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, February 2021
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Readers on

mendeley
68 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Effectiveness and process evaluation in obesity and type 2 diabetes prevention programs in children: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Published in
BMC Public Health, February 2021
DOI 10.1186/s12889-021-10297-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

M. Seral-Cortes, P. De Miguel-Etayo, P. Zapata, M. L. Miguel-Berges, L. A. Moreno

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 68 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 68 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 6 9%
Student > Master 5 7%
Student > Bachelor 5 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 4%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 4%
Other 11 16%
Unknown 35 51%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 10%
Sports and Recreations 5 7%
Psychology 4 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 3%
Other 5 7%
Unknown 37 54%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 March 2021.
All research outputs
#15,943,569
of 20,578,028 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#11,204
of 13,428 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#288,198
of 412,973 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#4
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 20,578,028 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,428 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.6. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 412,973 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.