You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Building a trusted framework for uncertainty assessment in rare diseases: suggestions for improvement (Response to “TRUST4RD: tool for reducing uncertainties in the evidence generation for specialised treatments for rare diseases”)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases, February 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13023-020-01666-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sabine E. Grimm, Xavier Pouwels, Bram L. T. Ramaekers, Ben Wijnen, Saskia Knies, Janneke Grutters, Manuela A. Joore |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| India | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 28 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 21% |
| Researcher | 3 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 7% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 7% |
| Professor | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 13 | 46% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 14% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 3 | 11% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 7% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 7% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 7% |
| Other | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 14 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 July 2021.
All research outputs
#18,820,431
of 23,323,574 outputs
Outputs from Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
#2,186
of 2,675 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#378,554
of 505,192 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
#58
of 80 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,323,574 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,675 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 505,192 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 80 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.