You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Continuous use of glycomacropeptide in the nutritional management of patients with phenylketonuria: a clinical perspective
|
---|---|
Published in |
Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases, February 2021
|
DOI | 10.1186/s13023-021-01721-8 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Maria João Pena, Alex Pinto, Manuela Ferreira de Almeida, Catarina de Sousa Barbosa, Paula Cristina Ramos, Sara Rocha, Arlindo Guimas, Rosa Ribeiro, Esmeralda Martins, Anabela Bandeira, Cláudia Camila Dias, Anita MacDonald, Nuno Borges, Júlio César Rocha |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 14% |
Unknown | 6 | 86% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 4 | 57% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 29% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 32 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 5 | 16% |
Unspecified | 4 | 13% |
Researcher | 4 | 13% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 6% |
Student > Bachelor | 2 | 6% |
Other | 6 | 19% |
Unknown | 9 | 28% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 16% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 16% |
Unspecified | 4 | 13% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 9% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 6% |
Other | 3 | 9% |
Unknown | 10 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 February 2021.
All research outputs
#8,033,177
of 24,149,630 outputs
Outputs from Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
#1,173
of 2,833 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#201,056
of 523,501 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
#39
of 88 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,149,630 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,833 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 523,501 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 88 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.