You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Monitoring circulating dipeptidyl peptidase 3 (DPP3) predicts improvement of organ failure and survival in sepsis: a prospective observational multinational study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Care, February 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13054-021-03471-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Alice Blet, Benjamin Deniau, Karine Santos, Dirk P. T. van Lier, Feriel Azibani, Xavier Wittebole, Benjamin G. Chousterman, Etienne Gayat, Oliver Hartmann, Joachim Struck, Andreas Bergmann, Massimo Antonelli, Albertus Beishuizen, Jean-Michel Constantin, Charles Damoisel, Nicolas Deye, Salvatore Di Somma, Thierry Dugernier, Bruno François, Stephane Gaudry, Vincent Huberlant, Jean-Baptiste Lascarrou, Gernot Marx, Emmanuelle Mercier, Haikel Oueslati, Peter Pickkers, Romain Sonneville, Matthieu Legrand, Pierre-François Laterre, Alexandre Mebazaa |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 24 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 7 | 29% |
| Spain | 3 | 13% |
| Canada | 3 | 13% |
| United States | 2 | 8% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 4% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | 4% |
| Mexico | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 6 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 15 | 63% |
| Scientists | 7 | 29% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 4% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 63 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 63 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 7 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 10% |
| Other | 5 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 10 | 16% |
| Unknown | 25 | 40% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 17 | 27% |
| Engineering | 5 | 8% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 6% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 5% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 6 | 10% |
| Unknown | 25 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 467. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 February 2024.
All research outputs
#57,979
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#10
of 6,555 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,094
of 557,742 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#1
of 123 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,555 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 557,742 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 123 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.