You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Genomic evidence for sulfur intermediates as new biogeochemical hubs in a model aquatic microbial ecosystem
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Microbiome, February 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s40168-021-00999-x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Adrien Vigneron, Perrine Cruaud, Alexander I. Culley, Raoul-Marie Couture, Connie Lovejoy, Warwick F. Vincent |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 21% |
| Canada | 4 | 21% |
| Netherlands | 2 | 11% |
| Austria | 1 | 5% |
| Italy | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 7 | 37% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 13 | 68% |
| Members of the public | 6 | 32% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 74 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 74 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 20 | 27% |
| Researcher | 13 | 18% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 10 | 14% |
| Unknown | 15 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 18 | 24% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 18 | 24% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 11 | 15% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 3 | 4% |
| Engineering | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 5 | 7% |
| Unknown | 16 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 March 2021.
All research outputs
#1,730,322
of 23,283,373 outputs
Outputs from Microbiome
#682
of 1,482 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#48,283
of 421,299 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Microbiome
#38
of 82 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,283,373 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,482 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 421,299 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 82 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.