You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Artificial intelligence for good health: a scoping review of the ethics literature
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medical Ethics, February 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12910-021-00577-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kathleen Murphy, Erica Di Ruggiero, Ross Upshur, Donald J. Willison, Neha Malhotra, Jia Ce Cai, Nakul Malhotra, Vincci Lui, Jennifer Gibson |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 38 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 8 | 21% |
| United States | 7 | 18% |
| India | 5 | 13% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 8% |
| Spain | 1 | 3% |
| South Africa | 1 | 3% |
| Nigeria | 1 | 3% |
| Italy | 1 | 3% |
| Sweden | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 10 | 26% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 23 | 61% |
| Scientists | 6 | 16% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 13% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 476 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 476 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 42 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 37 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 35 | 7% |
| Researcher | 33 | 7% |
| Other | 24 | 5% |
| Other | 93 | 20% |
| Unknown | 212 | 45% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 55 | 12% |
| Computer Science | 43 | 9% |
| Social Sciences | 31 | 7% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 22 | 5% |
| Unspecified | 21 | 4% |
| Other | 85 | 18% |
| Unknown | 219 | 46% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 June 2022.
All research outputs
#1,566,317
of 24,282,284 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Ethics
#133
of 1,041 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#49,328
of 556,927 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Ethics
#3
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,282,284 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,041 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 556,927 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.