You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Does insulin resistance influence neurodegeneration in non-diabetic Alzheimer’s subjects?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Alzheimer's Research & Therapy, February 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13195-021-00784-w |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Grazia Daniela Femminella, Nicholas R. Livingston, Sanara Raza, Thalia van der Doef, Eleni Frangou, Sharon Love, Gail Busza, Valeria Calsolaro, Stefan Carver, Clive Holmes, Craig W. Ritchie, Robert M. Lawrence, Brady McFarlane, George Tadros, Basil H. Ridha, Carol Bannister, Zuzana Walker, Hilary Archer, Elizabeth Coulthard, Ben Underwood, Aparna Prasanna, Paul Koranteng, Salman Karim, Kehinde Junaid, Bernadette McGuinness, Anthony Peter Passmore, Ramin Nilforooshan, Ajayverma Macharouthu, Andrew Donaldson, Simon Thacker, Gregor Russell, Naghma Malik, Vandana Mate, Lucy Knight, Sajeev Kshemendran, Tricia Tan, Christian Holscher, John Harrison, David J. Brooks, Clive Ballard, Paul Edison |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 24 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 9 | 38% |
| United States | 4 | 17% |
| Brazil | 1 | 4% |
| France | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 9 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 13 | 54% |
| Scientists | 7 | 29% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 13% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 78 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 78 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 9% |
| Researcher | 6 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 6% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 12 | 15% |
| Unknown | 30 | 38% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 10 | 13% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 10% |
| Neuroscience | 7 | 9% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 10 | 13% |
| Unknown | 36 | 46% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 40. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 February 2024.
All research outputs
#1,042,555
of 25,617,409 outputs
Outputs from Alzheimer's Research & Therapy
#133
of 1,486 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,529
of 456,669 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Alzheimer's Research & Therapy
#10
of 73 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,617,409 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,486 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 456,669 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 73 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.