You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Impact of long-term elosulfase alfa treatment on clinical and patient-reported outcomes in patients with mucopolysaccharidosis type IVA: results from a Managed Access Agreement in England
|
---|---|
Published in |
Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases, January 2021
|
DOI | 10.1186/s13023-021-01675-x |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Maureen Cleary, James Davison, Rachel Gould, Tarekegn Geberhiwot, Derralynn Hughes, Jean Mercer, Alexandra Morrison, Elaine Murphy, Saikat Santra, James Jarrett, Swati Mukherjee, Karolina M. Stepien |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 38 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 38 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 5 | 13% |
Researcher | 4 | 11% |
Student > Master | 3 | 8% |
Other | 2 | 5% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 3% |
Other | 2 | 5% |
Unknown | 21 | 55% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 5 | 13% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 11% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 8% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 5% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 3% |
Other | 2 | 5% |
Unknown | 21 | 55% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 February 2021.
All research outputs
#20,687,221
of 23,283,373 outputs
Outputs from Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
#2,514
of 2,669 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#430,810
of 503,744 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
#62
of 77 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,283,373 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,669 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 503,744 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 77 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.