↓ Skip to main content

Belinostat in combination with standard cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine and prednisone as first-line treatment for patients with newly diagnosed peripheral T-cell lymphoma

Overview of attention for article published in Experimental Hematology & Oncology, February 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Readers on

mendeley
28 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Belinostat in combination with standard cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine and prednisone as first-line treatment for patients with newly diagnosed peripheral T-cell lymphoma
Published in
Experimental Hematology & Oncology, February 2021
DOI 10.1186/s40164-021-00203-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Patrick B. Johnston, Amanda F. Cashen, Petros G. Nikolinakos, Anne W. Beaven, Stefan Klaus Barta, Gajanan Bhat, Steven J. Hasal, Sven De Vos, Yasuhiro Oki, Changchun Deng, Francine M. Foss

Abstract

Belinostat is a histone deacetylase inhibitor approved for relapsed refractory peripheral T-cell lymphoma (PTCL). The primary objective of this study was to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of belinostat combined with CHOP (Bel-CHOP). Secondary objectives included safety/tolerability, overall response rate (ORR), and belinostat pharmacokinetics (PK). Patients were ≥ 18 years with histologically confirmed, previously untreated PTCL. Patients received belinostat (1000 mg/m2 once daily) + standard CHOP for 6 cycles with varying schedules using a 3 + 3 design in Part A. Part B enrolled patients at MTD dose. Twenty-three patients were treated. One patient experienced DLT (Grade 3 non-hematologic toxicity) on Day 1-3 schedule, resulting in escalation to Day 1-5 schedule (n = 3). No DLTs were observed and Day 1-5 schedule with 1000 mg/m2 was declared as MTD. Twelve additional patients were enrolled in Part B using MTD. Median relative dose intensity was 98%. All patients experienced adverse events (AEs), including nausea (78%), fatigue (61%), and vomiting (57%). Serious AEs occurred in 43%, with febrile neutropenia (17%) and pyrexia (13%). Overall ORR was 86% with 71% reported CR at MTD. Belinostat PK parameters were similar to single-agent. Bel-CHOP was well tolerated and MTD in CHOP combination was the same dose and schedule as single agent dosing. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01839097.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 28 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 6 21%
Researcher 3 11%
Student > Bachelor 2 7%
Student > Postgraduate 2 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 4%
Other 4 14%
Unknown 10 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 6 21%
Chemistry 2 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 7%
Mathematics 1 4%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 4%
Other 5 18%
Unknown 11 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 February 2021.
All research outputs
#18,125,896
of 23,283,373 outputs
Outputs from Experimental Hematology & Oncology
#203
of 304 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#301,032
of 420,296 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Experimental Hematology & Oncology
#11
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,283,373 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 304 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.9. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 420,296 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.