↓ Skip to main content

miRNAs and sports: tracking training status and potentially confounding diagnoses

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Translational Medicine, July 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
27 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
81 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
miRNAs and sports: tracking training status and potentially confounding diagnoses
Published in
Journal of Translational Medicine, July 2016
DOI 10.1186/s12967-016-0974-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Anne Hecksteden, Petra Leidinger, Christina Backes, Stefanie Rheinheimer, Mark Pfeiffer, Alexander Ferrauti, Michael Kellmann, Farbod Sedaghat, Benjamin Meder, Eckart Meese, Tim Meyer, Andreas Keller

Abstract

The dependency of miRNA abundance from physiological processes such as exercises remains partially understood. We set out to analyze the effect of physical exercises on miRNA profiles in blood and plasma of endurance and strength athletes in a systematic manner and correlated differentially abundant miRNAs in athletes to disease miRNAs biomarkers towards a better understanding of how physical exercise may confound disease diagnosis by miRNAs. We profiled blood and plasma of 29 athletes before and after exercise. With four samples analyzed for each individual we analyzed 116 full miRNomes. The study set-up enabled paired analyses of individuals. Affected miRNAs were investigated for known disease associations using network analysis. MiRNA patterns in blood and plasma of endurance and strength athletes vary significantly with differences in blood outreaching variations in plasma. We found only moderate differences between the miRNA levels before training and the RNA levels after training as compared to the more obvious variations found between strength athletes and endurance athletes. We observed significant variations in the abundance of miR-140-3p that is a known circulating disease markers (raw and adjusted p value of 5 × 10(-12) and 4 × 10(-7)). Similarly, the levels of miR-140-5p and miR-650, both of which have been reported as makers for a wide range of human pathologies significantly depend on the training mode. Among the most affected disease categories we found acute myocardial infarction. MiRNAs, which are up-regulated in endurance athletes inhibit VEGFA as shown by systems biology analysis of experimentally validated target genes. We provide evidence that the mode and the extent of training are important confounding factors for a miRNA based disease diagnosis.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 81 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Indonesia 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Unknown 79 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 17%
Researcher 11 14%
Student > Bachelor 11 14%
Student > Master 5 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 4%
Other 11 14%
Unknown 26 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 13 16%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 12 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 6%
Other 10 12%
Unknown 26 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 July 2020.
All research outputs
#6,982,354
of 23,344,526 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Translational Medicine
#1,080
of 4,117 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#117,031
of 367,247 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Translational Medicine
#21
of 89 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,344,526 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,117 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 367,247 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 89 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.