You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Stringent thresholds in SARS-CoV-2 IgG assays lead to under-detection of mild infections
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Infectious Diseases, February 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12879-021-05878-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
David W. Eyre, Sheila F. Lumley, Denise O’Donnell, Nicole E. Stoesser, Philippa C. Matthews, Alison Howarth, Stephanie B. Hatch, Brian D. Marsden, Stuart Cox, Tim James, Richard J. Cornall, David I. Stuart, Gavin Screaton, Daniel Ebner, Derrick W. Crook, Christopher P. Conlon, Katie Jeffery, Timothy M. Walker, Timothy E. A. Peto |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 45 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 9 | 20% |
| United Kingdom | 5 | 11% |
| Canada | 3 | 7% |
| Belgium | 1 | 2% |
| Curaçao | 1 | 2% |
| Australia | 1 | 2% |
| India | 1 | 2% |
| Germany | 1 | 2% |
| France | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 22 | 49% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 39 | 87% |
| Scientists | 3 | 7% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 4% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 64 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 64 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 6 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 16 | 25% |
| Unknown | 23 | 36% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 18 | 28% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 11% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 4 | 6% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 7 | 11% |
| Unknown | 22 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 31. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 September 2023.
All research outputs
#1,309,169
of 25,728,855 outputs
Outputs from BMC Infectious Diseases
#306
of 8,693 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,307
of 456,500 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Infectious Diseases
#8
of 203 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,728,855 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,693 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 456,500 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 203 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.