You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
There is still room for improvement in the completeness of abstract reporting according to the PRISMA-A checklist: a cross-sectional study on systematic reviews in periodontology
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Medical Research Methodology, February 2021
|
DOI | 10.1186/s12874-021-01223-y |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Milagros Adobes Martin, Sala Santamans Faustino, Inmaculada Llario Almiñana, Riccardo Aiuto, Roberto Rotundo, Daniele Garcovich |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 33% |
Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 19 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Lecturer | 2 | 11% |
Student > Bachelor | 2 | 11% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 11% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 11% |
Researcher | 2 | 11% |
Other | 2 | 11% |
Unknown | 7 | 37% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 32% |
Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 2 | 11% |
Computer Science | 1 | 5% |
Social Sciences | 1 | 5% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 5% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 8 | 42% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 March 2021.
All research outputs
#14,476,780
of 23,283,373 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#1,408
of 2,056 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#273,381
of 513,688 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#36
of 48 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,283,373 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,056 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.3. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 513,688 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 48 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.