You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Knowledge transfer for the management of dementia: a cluster-randomised trial of blended learning in general practice
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Implementation Science, January 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1748-5908-5-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Horst C Vollmar, Herbert Mayer, Thomas Ostermann, Martin E Butzlaff, John E Sandars, Stefan Wilm, Monika A Rieger |
| Abstract |
The implementation of new medical knowledge into general practice is a complex process. Blended learning may offer an effective and efficient educational intervention to reduce the knowledge-to-practice gap. The aim of this study was to compare knowledge acquisition about dementia management between a blended learning approach using online modules in addition to quality circles (QCs) and QCs alone. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 101 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 4 | 4% |
| Germany | 2 | 2% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Sierra Leone | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Cambodia | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 87 | 86% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 20 | 20% |
| Researcher | 19 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 11 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 7% |
| Other | 25 | 25% |
| Unknown | 8 | 8% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 23 | 23% |
| Social Sciences | 22 | 22% |
| Psychology | 13 | 13% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 8 | 8% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 6% |
| Other | 16 | 16% |
| Unknown | 13 | 13% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 October 2012.
All research outputs
#18,317,537
of 22,681,577 outputs
Outputs from Implementation Science
#1,642
of 1,718 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#150,202
of 163,828 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Implementation Science
#10
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,681,577 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,718 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.7. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 163,828 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.