You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Methods of rapid appraisal for in-situ management of genetic resources: a Malagasy set of tools
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Genetics Selection Evolution, December 2001
|
| DOI | 10.1186/bf03500897 |
| Authors |
Didier Babin, Fleurette Andriantsilavo, Sigrid Aubert, Géraldine PÉchard, Caroline Bourgeois, Martine Antona, Eléonore Béchaux, Lolona Ramamonjisoa Ranaivoson, Hélène I. Joly |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 9 | 90% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 4 | 40% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 30% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 10% |
| Professor | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 1 | 10% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 4 | 40% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 30% |
| Psychology | 1 | 10% |
| Decision Sciences | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 1 | 10% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 February 2021.
All research outputs
#8,540,769
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Genetics Selection Evolution
#303
of 821 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,701
of 132,044 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genetics Selection Evolution
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 821 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 132,044 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.