↓ Skip to main content

Risk of venous thromboembolism in hospitalised cancer patients in England—a cohort study

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Hematology & Oncology, July 2016
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
31 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Risk of venous thromboembolism in hospitalised cancer patients in England—a cohort study
Published in
Journal of Hematology & Oncology, July 2016
DOI 10.1186/s13045-016-0291-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sonia Ratib, Alex J. Walker, Tim R. Card, Matthew J. Grainge

Abstract

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a well-recognised and life-threatening complication in patients with cancer. However, the precise risk of VTE in hospitalised cancer patients in England has not been previously reported. We conducted a cohort study using linked Hospital Episodes Statistics and Office for National Statistics mortality data. We determined the risk of VTE separately for 24 cancer sites following first hospitalisation for cancer (index date) and how this varied by age, proximity from hospital admission, administration of chemotherapy and calendar time. Between 1998 and 2012, 3,558,660 patients were hospitalised for cancer. The cancer sites with the highest risk of VTE during initial hospitalisation for cancer were pancreatic (4.9 %), ovarian (4 %) and liver (3.8 %). The three cancer sites with the highest risk of first VTE event within 6 months from discharge were pancreatic (3.7 %), oesophagus (3 %) and stomach (2.8 %). For most cancers, the risk of VTE within 6 months from discharge was higher amongst patients who underwent chemotherapy compared to those who did not. The impact of age on risk of VTE varied considerably between cancer sites. The risk of VTE amongst patients hospitalised for cancer varies greatly by cancer site, age, proximity from hospital admission, and chemotherapy administration.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 31 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 23%
Student > Bachelor 5 16%
Student > Master 5 16%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 10%
Other 3 10%
Other 4 13%
Unknown 4 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 17 55%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 16%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 3%
Sports and Recreations 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 5 16%