You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Northern blotting analysis of microRNAs, their precursors and RNA interference triggers
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Molecular and Cell Biology, April 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2199-12-14 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Edyta Koscianska, Julia Starega-Roslan, Lukasz J Sznajder, Marta Olejniczak, Paulina Galka-Marciniak, Wlodzimierz J Krzyzosiak |
| Abstract |
Numerous microRNAs (miRNAs) have heterogeneous ends resulting from imprecise cleavages by processing nucleases and from various non-templated nucleotide additions. The scale of miRNA end-heterogeneity is best shown by deep sequencing data revealing not only the major miRNA variants but also those that occur in only minute amounts and are unlikely to be of functional importance. All RNA interference (RNAi) technology reagents that are expressed and processed in cells are also exposed to the same machinery generating end-heterogeneity of the released short interfering RNAs (siRNAs) or miRNA mimetics. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 148 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 3 | 2% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Poland | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 139 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 33 | 22% |
| Researcher | 26 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 23 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 13 | 9% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 9 | 6% |
| Other | 18 | 12% |
| Unknown | 26 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 60 | 41% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 28 | 19% |
| Chemistry | 9 | 6% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 5% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 8 | 5% |
| Unknown | 34 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 March 2020.
All research outputs
#4,261,355
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from BMC Molecular and Cell Biology
#86
of 1,233 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,862
of 120,480 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Molecular and Cell Biology
#3
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,233 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 120,480 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.