↓ Skip to main content

Identification of protein complexes from multi-relationship protein interaction networks

Overview of attention for article published in Human Genomics, July 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
8 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Identification of protein complexes from multi-relationship protein interaction networks
Published in
Human Genomics, July 2016
DOI 10.1186/s40246-016-0069-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Xueyong Li, Jianxin Wang, Bihai Zhao, Fang-Xiang Wu, Yi Pan

Abstract

Protein complexes play an important role in biological processes. Recent developments in experiments have resulted in the publication of many high-quality, large-scale protein-protein interaction (PPI) datasets, which provide abundant data for computational approaches to the prediction of protein complexes. However, the precision of protein complex prediction still needs to be improved due to the incompletion and noise in PPI networks. There exist complex and diverse relationships among proteins after integrating multiple sources of biological information. Considering that the influences of different types of interactions are not the same weight for protein complex prediction, we construct a multi-relationship protein interaction network (MPIN) by integrating PPI network topology with gene ontology annotation information. Then, we design a novel algorithm named MINE (identifying protein complexes based on Multi-relationship protein Interaction NEtwork) to predict protein complexes with high cohesion and low coupling from MPIN. The experiments on yeast data show that MINE outperforms the current methods in terms of both accuracy and statistical significance.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 8 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 3 38%
Other 1 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 13%
Student > Master 1 13%
Student > Postgraduate 1 13%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 1 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 63%
Computer Science 1 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 13%
Unknown 1 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 July 2016.
All research outputs
#17,283,763
of 25,368,786 outputs
Outputs from Human Genomics
#389
of 564 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#251,178
of 379,924 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Human Genomics
#10
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,368,786 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 564 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 379,924 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.