You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A myriad of factors influencing the implementation of transitional care innovations: a scoping review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Implementation Science, February 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13012-021-01087-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Amal Fakha, Lindsay Groenvynck, Bram de Boer, Theo van Achterberg, Jan Hamers, Hilde Verbeek |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 2 | 18% |
| Ireland | 1 | 9% |
| United States | 1 | 9% |
| Canada | 1 | 9% |
| Unknown | 6 | 55% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 8 | 73% |
| Scientists | 2 | 18% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 82 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 82 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 12 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 12% |
| Researcher | 7 | 9% |
| Librarian | 5 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 16 | 20% |
| Unknown | 28 | 34% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 16 | 20% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 11% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 6% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 4 | 5% |
| Psychology | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 14 | 17% |
| Unknown | 31 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 March 2021.
All research outputs
#5,682,539
of 23,285,523 outputs
Outputs from Implementation Science
#976
of 1,728 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#124,122
of 417,422 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Implementation Science
#21
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,285,523 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,728 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.8. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 417,422 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.