↓ Skip to main content

Ginkgolic acid and anacardic acid are specific covalent inhibitors of SARS-CoV-2 cysteine proteases

Overview of attention for article published in Cell & Bioscience, February 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users
patent
2 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
48 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
53 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Ginkgolic acid and anacardic acid are specific covalent inhibitors of SARS-CoV-2 cysteine proteases
Published in
Cell & Bioscience, February 2021
DOI 10.1186/s13578-021-00564-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Zinuo Chen, Qinghua Cui, Laura Cooper, Pin Zhang, Hyun Lee, Zhaoyu Chen, Yanyan Wang, Xiaoyun Liu, Lijun Rong, Ruikun Du

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 53 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 53 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 17%
Student > Bachelor 7 13%
Student > Postgraduate 5 9%
Student > Master 5 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 9%
Other 8 15%
Unknown 14 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 12 23%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 6 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 6%
Other 6 11%
Unknown 16 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 December 2022.
All research outputs
#3,625,020
of 25,727,480 outputs
Outputs from Cell & Bioscience
#110
of 1,191 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#91,877
of 451,764 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cell & Bioscience
#6
of 52 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,727,480 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,191 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 451,764 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 52 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.