You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A retrospective chart review to identify perinatal factors associated with food allergies
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nutrition Journal, October 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1475-2891-11-87 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kelly Dowhower Karpa, Ian M Paul, J Alexander Leckie, Sharon Shung, Nurgul Carkaci-Salli, Kent E Vrana, David Mauger, Tracy Fausnight, Jennifer Poger |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 29% |
| Ireland | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 4 | 57% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 4 | 57% |
| Members of the public | 3 | 43% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 91 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
| Philippines | 1 | 1% |
| Brazil | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 88 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 21 | 23% |
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 13% |
| Researcher | 10 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 8% |
| Other | 16 | 18% |
| Unknown | 16 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 34 | 37% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 13 | 14% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 9 | 10% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 3% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 9 | 10% |
| Unknown | 21 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 June 2016.
All research outputs
#6,418,662
of 25,654,806 outputs
Outputs from Nutrition Journal
#848
of 1,530 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#47,263
of 194,426 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nutrition Journal
#24
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,654,806 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,530 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 39.9. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 194,426 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.