You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Facilitators and barriers in anorexia nervosa treatment initiation: a qualitative study on the perspectives of patients, carers and professionals
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Eating Disorders, February 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s40337-021-00381-0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Denise Kästner, Angelika Weigel, Ines Buchholz, Ulrich Voderholzer, Bernd Löwe, Antje Gumz |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 25% |
| United States | 1 | 13% |
| Australia | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 4 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 63% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 25% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 42 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 12% |
| Other | 1 | 2% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 2% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 4 | 10% |
| Unknown | 24 | 57% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 9 | 21% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 12% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 10% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 23 | 55% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 October 2023.
All research outputs
#2,348,207
of 24,629,540 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Eating Disorders
#245
of 915 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#60,438
of 424,221 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Eating Disorders
#9
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,629,540 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 915 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 424,221 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.