↓ Skip to main content

Unipolar versus bipolar hemiarthroplasty for displaced femoral neck fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, January 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
42 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
97 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Unipolar versus bipolar hemiarthroplasty for displaced femoral neck fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
Published in
Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, January 2015
DOI 10.1186/s13018-015-0165-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Zhiwei Jia, Fan Ding, Yaohong Wu, Wei Li, Haifeng Li, Deli Wang, Qing He, Dike Ruan

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 97 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 1%
Unknown 96 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 17 18%
Researcher 13 13%
Student > Master 13 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 10%
Student > Postgraduate 9 9%
Other 13 13%
Unknown 22 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 54 56%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 5%
Engineering 3 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 2%
Social Sciences 2 2%
Other 3 3%
Unknown 28 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 July 2016.
All research outputs
#15,380,722
of 22,881,964 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
#647
of 1,378 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#209,656
of 352,373 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
#7
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,881,964 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,378 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,373 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.