You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
NIR-laser-triggered gadolinium-doped carbon dots for magnetic resonance imaging, drug delivery and combined photothermal chemotherapy for triple negative breast cancer
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Nanobiotechnology, March 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12951-021-00811-w |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Qunjiao Jiang, Li Liu, Qiuying Li, Yi Cao, Dong Chen, Qishi Du, Xiaobo Yang, Dongping Huang, Renjun Pei, Xing Chen, Gang Huang |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 56 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 56 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 8 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 11% |
| Other | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 5% |
| Unknown | 26 | 46% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chemistry | 5 | 9% |
| Chemical Engineering | 4 | 7% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 5% |
| Materials Science | 3 | 5% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 12 | 21% |
| Unknown | 26 | 46% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 March 2021.
All research outputs
#18,790,452
of 23,285,523 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Nanobiotechnology
#942
of 1,485 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#316,533
of 419,786 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Nanobiotechnology
#36
of 60 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,285,523 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,485 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 419,786 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 60 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.