↓ Skip to main content

Validation study of the prototype of a disease-specific index measure for health-related quality of life in dementia

Overview of attention for article published in Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, September 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
240 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Validation study of the prototype of a disease-specific index measure for health-related quality of life in dementia
Published in
Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, September 2012
DOI 10.1186/1477-7525-10-118
Pubmed ID
Authors

Carla J M Schölzel-Dorenbos, Alexander M M Arons, Joost J G Wammes, Marcel G M Olde Rikkert, Paul F M Krabbe

Abstract

Index measures for health-related quality of life (HRQoL) quantify the desirability (utility) of a certain health state. The commonly used generic index measure, e.g. EuroQol: EQ-5D, may underestimate relevant areas of specific diseases, resulting in lower validity. Disease-specific index measures on the other hand combine disease-specificity and quantification of perceived quality on several health domains of a certain disease into one single figure. These instruments have been developed for several diseases, but a dementia-specific HRQoL index instrument was not yet available. Facing the increasing individual and societal burden of dementia, specific HRQoL values with metric characteristics are especially useful because they will provide vital information for health outcome research and economic evaluations.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 240 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 2 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Unknown 235 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 37 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 30 13%
Researcher 25 10%
Student > Bachelor 16 7%
Student > Postgraduate 14 6%
Other 43 18%
Unknown 75 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 51 21%
Nursing and Health Professions 40 17%
Psychology 22 9%
Social Sciences 17 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 3%
Other 24 10%
Unknown 80 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 November 2012.
All research outputs
#17,285,036
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
#1,449
of 2,297 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#125,657
of 190,772 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
#19
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,297 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 190,772 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.