↓ Skip to main content

Meningitis in adult patients with a negative direct cerebrospinal fluid examination: value of cytochemical markers for differential diagnosis

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Care, June 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
110 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
143 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Meningitis in adult patients with a negative direct cerebrospinal fluid examination: value of cytochemical markers for differential diagnosis
Published in
Critical Care, June 2011
DOI 10.1186/cc10254
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alain Viallon, Nicolas Desseigne, Olivier Marjollet, Albert Birynczyk, Mathieu Belin, Stephane Guyomarch, Jacques Borg, Bruno Pozetto, Jean Claude Bertrand, Fabrice Zeni

Abstract

The objective of this study was to determine the ability of various parameters commonly used for the diagnosis of acute meningitis to differentiate between bacterial and viral meningitis, in adult patients with a negative direct cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) examination.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 143 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 3 2%
Japan 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Unknown 137 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 23 16%
Researcher 18 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 13%
Student > Postgraduate 17 12%
Other 17 12%
Other 27 19%
Unknown 23 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 85 59%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 6%
Neuroscience 7 5%
Immunology and Microbiology 4 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 2%
Other 6 4%
Unknown 30 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 November 2022.
All research outputs
#15,169,949
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#4,987
of 6,554 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#85,993
of 123,374 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#29
of 44 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,554 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 123,374 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 44 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.