↓ Skip to main content

A Practical Guide to Rodent Islet Isolation and Assessment Revisited

Overview of attention for article published in Biological Procedures Online, March 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (60th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
patent
2 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
25 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
78 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A Practical Guide to Rodent Islet Isolation and Assessment Revisited
Published in
Biological Procedures Online, March 2021
DOI 10.1186/s12575-021-00143-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kathryn L. Corbin, Hannah L. West, Samantha Brodsky, Nicholas B. Whitticar, William J. Koch, Craig S. Nunemaker

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 78 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 78 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 17 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 19%
Student > Bachelor 5 6%
Student > Master 5 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 4%
Other 2 3%
Unknown 31 40%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 21 27%
Engineering 6 8%
Neuroscience 6 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 3%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 3%
Other 8 10%
Unknown 33 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 February 2024.
All research outputs
#8,100,997
of 25,008,338 outputs
Outputs from Biological Procedures Online
#64
of 188 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#167,985
of 427,399 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biological Procedures Online
#3
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,008,338 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 188 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 427,399 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.