↓ Skip to main content

Retraction Note to: Downregulation of miR-483-5p decreases hypoxia-induced injury in human cardiomyocytes by targeting MAPK3

Overview of attention for article published in Cellular & Molecular Biology Letters, March 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#19 of 389)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
1 tweeter
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Retraction Note to: Downregulation of miR-483-5p decreases hypoxia-induced injury in human cardiomyocytes by targeting MAPK3
Published in
Cellular & Molecular Biology Letters, March 2021
DOI 10.1186/s11658-021-00252-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yan Hao, Haitao Yuan, Houzhi Yu

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 April 2021.
All research outputs
#4,081,160
of 21,011,736 outputs
Outputs from Cellular & Molecular Biology Letters
#19
of 389 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#89,972
of 315,992 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cellular & Molecular Biology Letters
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,011,736 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 389 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 315,992 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them