You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Multiparametric exercise stress cardiovascular magnetic resonance in the diagnosis of coronary artery disease: the EMPIRE trial
|
---|---|
Published in |
Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging, March 2021
|
DOI | 10.1186/s12968-021-00705-8 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Thu-Thao Le, Briana W. Y. Ang, Jennifer A. Bryant, Chee Yang Chin, Khung Keong Yeo, Philip E. H. Wong, Kay Woon Ho, Jack W. C. Tan, Phong Teck Lee, Calvin W. L. Chin, Stuart A. Cook |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 6 | 86% |
Hong Kong | 1 | 14% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 43% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 43% |
Members of the public | 1 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 34 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unspecified | 4 | 12% |
Researcher | 3 | 9% |
Other | 3 | 9% |
Student > Bachelor | 2 | 6% |
Lecturer | 1 | 3% |
Other | 5 | 15% |
Unknown | 16 | 47% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 24% |
Unspecified | 4 | 12% |
Engineering | 3 | 9% |
Computer Science | 2 | 6% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 6% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 15 | 44% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 November 2021.
All research outputs
#7,088,626
of 25,728,855 outputs
Outputs from Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging
#510
of 1,386 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#151,024
of 453,807 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging
#9
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,728,855 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,386 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 453,807 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.