↓ Skip to main content

A model for homeopathic remedy effects: low dose nanoparticles, allostatic cross-adaptation, and time-dependent sensitization in a complex adaptive system

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies, October 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#42 of 3,975)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
5 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
135 X users
patent
4 patents
facebook
46 Facebook pages
googleplus
3 Google+ users
linkedin
1 LinkedIn user

Citations

dimensions_citation
71 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
161 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A model for homeopathic remedy effects: low dose nanoparticles, allostatic cross-adaptation, and time-dependent sensitization in a complex adaptive system
Published in
BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies, October 2012
DOI 10.1186/1472-6882-12-191
Pubmed ID
Authors

Iris R Bell, Mary Koithan

Abstract

This paper proposes a novel model for homeopathic remedy action on living systems. Research indicates that homeopathic remedies (a) contain measurable source and silica nanoparticles heterogeneously dispersed in colloidal solution; (b) act by modulating biological function of the allostatic stress response network (c) evoke biphasic actions on living systems via organism-dependent adaptive and endogenously amplified effects; (d) improve systemic resilience.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 135 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 161 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Colombia 2 1%
Italy 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 155 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 24 15%
Researcher 23 14%
Student > Master 19 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 17 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 9%
Other 34 21%
Unknown 30 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 49 30%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 6%
Psychology 7 4%
Other 33 20%
Unknown 40 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 180. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 December 2023.
All research outputs
#224,646
of 25,584,565 outputs
Outputs from BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies
#42
of 3,975 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,090
of 200,581 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies
#2
of 86 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,584,565 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,975 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 200,581 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 86 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.