You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Improving design choices in Delphi studies in medicine: the case of an exemplary physician multi-round panel study with 100% response
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Medical Research Methodology, June 2020
|
DOI | 10.1186/s12874-020-01029-4 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Rebekka Veugelers, Menno I. Gaakeer, Peter Patka, Robbert Huijsman |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 25% |
United States | 1 | 25% |
Unknown | 2 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 50% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 120 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 120 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 22 | 18% |
Researcher | 13 | 11% |
Student > Master | 12 | 10% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 7% |
Lecturer | 6 | 5% |
Other | 21 | 18% |
Unknown | 38 | 32% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 26 | 22% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 19 | 16% |
Psychology | 4 | 3% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 3% |
Computer Science | 3 | 3% |
Other | 20 | 17% |
Unknown | 44 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 May 2022.
All research outputs
#13,499,698
of 23,287,285 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#1,280
of 2,056 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#195,377
of 399,448 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#65
of 84 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,287,285 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,056 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.3. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 399,448 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 84 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.