You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The decision sampling framework: a methodological approach to investigate evidence use in policy and programmatic innovation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Implementation Science, March 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13012-021-01084-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Thomas I. Mackie, Ana J. Schaefer, Justeen K. Hyde, Laurel K. Leslie, Emily A. Bosk, Brittany Fishman, R. Christopher Sheldrick |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 7 | 41% |
| Canada | 2 | 12% |
| Unknown | 8 | 47% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 8 | 47% |
| Scientists | 6 | 35% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 12% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 63 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 63 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 8 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 10% |
| Researcher | 4 | 6% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 11 | 17% |
| Unknown | 22 | 35% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 11 | 17% |
| Unspecified | 8 | 13% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 8% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 6% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 8 | 13% |
| Unknown | 24 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 July 2021.
All research outputs
#1,863,032
of 25,658,139 outputs
Outputs from Implementation Science
#344
of 1,817 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#49,972
of 454,074 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Implementation Science
#8
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,658,139 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,817 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 454,074 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.