You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Clinical risk prediction with random forests for survival, longitudinal, and multivariate (RF-SLAM) data analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medical Research Methodology, December 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12874-019-0863-0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Shannon Wongvibulsin, Katherine C. Wu, Scott L. Zeger |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 183 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 183 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 30 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 24 | 13% |
| Researcher | 20 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 16 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 15 | 8% |
| Other | 18 | 10% |
| Unknown | 60 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Computer Science | 29 | 16% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 25 | 14% |
| Engineering | 10 | 5% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 8 | 4% |
| Mathematics | 8 | 4% |
| Other | 35 | 19% |
| Unknown | 68 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 42. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 May 2021.
All research outputs
#850,446
of 23,287,285 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#81
of 2,056 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,086
of 457,379 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#5
of 49 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,287,285 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,056 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 457,379 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 49 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.