You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Metabolomics reveals the metabolic shifts following an intervention with rye bread in postmenopausal women- a randomized control trial
|
---|---|
Published in |
Nutrition Journal, October 2012
|
DOI | 10.1186/1475-2891-11-88 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Ali A Moazzami, Isabel Bondia-Pons, Kati Hanhineva, Katri Juntunen, Nadja Antl, Kaisa Poutanen, Hannu Mykkänen |
Abstract |
Epidemiological studies have consistently shown that whole grain (WG) cereals can protect against the development of chronic diseases, but the underlying mechanism is not fully understood. Among WG products, WG rye is considered even more potent because of its unique discrepancy in postprandial insulin and glucose responses known as the rye factor. In this study, an NMR-based metabolomics approach was applied to study the metabolic effects of WG rye as a tool to determine the beneficial effects of WG rye on human health. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Australia | 1 | 25% |
Netherlands | 1 | 25% |
Unknown | 2 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 50% |
Scientists | 1 | 25% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 115 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Spain | 1 | <1% |
United States | 1 | <1% |
Sweden | 1 | <1% |
Denmark | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 111 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 22 | 19% |
Student > Bachelor | 18 | 16% |
Researcher | 14 | 12% |
Student > Master | 14 | 12% |
Other | 7 | 6% |
Other | 16 | 14% |
Unknown | 24 | 21% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 24 | 21% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 23 | 20% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 17 | 15% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 9 | 8% |
Chemistry | 5 | 4% |
Other | 8 | 7% |
Unknown | 29 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 October 2012.
All research outputs
#14,487,326
of 25,199,243 outputs
Outputs from Nutrition Journal
#1,034
of 1,504 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#104,609
of 190,414 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nutrition Journal
#27
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,199,243 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,504 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 39.6. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 190,414 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.