You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Evolution of an adenocarcinoma in response to selection by targeted kinase inhibitors
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Genome Biology, August 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1186/gb-2010-11-8-r82 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Steven JM Jones, Janessa Laskin, Yvonne Y Li, Obi L Griffith, Jianghong An, Mikhail Bilenky, Yaron S Butterfield, Timothee Cezard, Eric Chuah, Richard Corbett, Anthony P Fejes, Malachi Griffith, John Yee, Montgomery Martin, Michael Mayo, Nataliya Melnyk, Ryan D Morin, Trevor J Pugh, Tesa Severson, Sohrab P Shah, Margaret Sutcliffe, Angela Tam, Jefferson Terry, Nina Thiessen, Thomas Thomson, Richard Varhol, Thomas Zeng, Yongjun Zhao, Richard A Moore, David G Huntsman, Inanc Birol, Martin Hirst, Robert A Holt, Marco A Marra |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 31% |
| Canada | 4 | 31% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 15% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 8% |
| Bosnia and Herzegovina | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 1 | 8% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 7 | 54% |
| Members of the public | 5 | 38% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 213 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 5 | 2% |
| United States | 3 | 1% |
| Germany | 2 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 2 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 7 | 3% |
| Unknown | 189 | 89% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 52 | 24% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 37 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 23 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 21 | 10% |
| Other | 16 | 8% |
| Other | 43 | 20% |
| Unknown | 21 | 10% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 93 | 44% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 38 | 18% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 33 | 15% |
| Computer Science | 12 | 6% |
| Engineering | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 13 | 6% |
| Unknown | 20 | 9% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 73. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 May 2022.
All research outputs
#587,025
of 25,455,127 outputs
Outputs from Genome Biology
#353
of 4,476 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,482
of 104,553 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genome Biology
#1
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,455,127 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,476 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 104,553 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.