You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Professionals’ management of the fidelity–adaptation dilemma in the use of evidence-based interventions—an intervention study
|
---|---|
Published in |
Implementation Science Communications, March 2021
|
DOI | 10.1186/s43058-021-00131-y |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Ulrica von Thiele Schwarz, Fabrizia Giannotta, Margit Neher, Johanna Zetterlund, Henna Hasson |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 3 | 25% |
Sweden | 1 | 8% |
Canada | 1 | 8% |
Australia | 1 | 8% |
Ireland | 1 | 8% |
Unknown | 5 | 42% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 8 | 67% |
Scientists | 3 | 25% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 31 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 23% |
Student > Master | 4 | 13% |
Researcher | 3 | 10% |
Lecturer | 2 | 6% |
Professor | 1 | 3% |
Other | 3 | 10% |
Unknown | 11 | 35% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 23% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 13% |
Psychology | 3 | 10% |
Social Sciences | 2 | 6% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 3% |
Other | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 13 | 42% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 July 2022.
All research outputs
#4,490,344
of 24,176,645 outputs
Outputs from Implementation Science Communications
#163
of 460 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#107,217
of 426,776 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Implementation Science Communications
#14
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,176,645 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 460 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 426,776 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.