You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Network meta-analysis-highly attractive but more methodological research is needed
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medicine, June 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1741-7015-9-79 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Tianjing Li, Milo A Puhan, Swaroop S Vedula, Sonal Singh, Kay Dickersin, The Ad Hoc Network Meta-analysis Methods Meeting Working Group |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 29 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 8 | 28% |
| Canada | 2 | 7% |
| United States | 2 | 7% |
| Norway | 1 | 3% |
| Colombia | 1 | 3% |
| Mexico | 1 | 3% |
| Kenya | 1 | 3% |
| Australia | 1 | 3% |
| Hong Kong | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 4 | 14% |
| Unknown | 7 | 24% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 15 | 52% |
| Scientists | 12 | 41% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 362 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 3 | <1% |
| France | 2 | <1% |
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Spain | 2 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Saudi Arabia | 1 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 2 | <1% |
| Unknown | 345 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 66 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 60 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 34 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 26 | 7% |
| Other | 24 | 7% |
| Other | 90 | 25% |
| Unknown | 62 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 130 | 36% |
| Psychology | 22 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 21 | 6% |
| Mathematics | 19 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 15 | 4% |
| Other | 70 | 19% |
| Unknown | 85 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 97. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 February 2023.
All research outputs
#434,898
of 25,383,225 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medicine
#331
of 3,995 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,497
of 123,309 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medicine
#2
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,383,225 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,995 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 45.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 123,309 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.